moonlog RSS

RSS

Archive

Oct
17th
Sat
permalink
Oct
16th
Fri
permalink

Kind of like that scene in Big. This could never happen here because (1) someone would get sued (or the fear of lawsuits itself would work its wonder) and (2) the many Metro stations don’t even have any conventional staircase. Thank the 1960s planners who thought stairs had no place in a technologically modern Great Society.

Oct
14th
Wed
permalink
Oct
13th
Tue
permalink

My parents live in one of those communities where drying clothes outside is forbidden. A neighbor once left a towel on his deck (in his backyard) after swimming and was fined. I kid you not. Stop the madness.

Oct
7th
Wed
permalink
Oct
6th
Tue
permalink
Oct
3rd
Sat
permalink
Metro’s builders faced a challenge equal and opposite to that of their [oil] pipeline counterparts. The obstacles they faced were human — both physical artifacts and living opponents. As workers in Alaska built 800 miles of pipeline through wilderness all but uninhabited by humans, workers in Washington took up the challenge of pushing 100 miles of rapid transit through a long-settled region densely populated by lawyers.
— Zachary Schrag, on the history of the Washington Metro. On a personal note, my father worked on the construction Interstate 66 inside the Beltway, which includes the Orange Line, so that’s pretty much the 20th-century equivalent of saying my papa worked on the railroad (all the live-long day).
Oct
2nd
Fri
permalink
It turns out that old people especially care about living less car-dependent lives and that the demographic growth of old people in the coming decades will be epochal. […] It has created the amusing effect of making America’s senior citizens a kind of New Urbanist vanguard.
— The Infrastucturalist on retrofitting the suburbs.
Sep
30th
Wed
permalink
In Stockholm, San Francisco, and Milan, as in Washington, builders of rapid transit systems hired architects and other designers to ensure not only that subways wouldn’t disgrace their homes but also that they would exemplify a modern city beautiful. In the late 1960s and early 1970s Toronto got jazzed up, and attempts were made to redesign prewar systems in Boston and Philadelphia. Washington took the notion of beauty the furthest, for only in Washington did a powerful federal agency have the mission of approving architectural plans without reference to cost. The Commission of Fine Arts may have gone too far in its intervention.
— Zachary Schrag, The Great Society Subway (2006), p. 93, describing how only in Washington does beauty trump cost under government bureaucracy. Weird.
Sep
29th
Tue
permalink